Loading…
Loading…
What everyone thought would happen — and what actually did. Pick whose mocks make up the consensus: the 13 analysts MDS tracks pick-by-pick (a sample that skews toward widely-read, high-ranking analysts — not all 203+ scored analysts), the community's saved mocks, or any mix. Compare against MDDB's 100+-analyst consensus and see how accurate mock drafts really are.
| Pick | Team | Consensus Pick | # Mocked | Consensus Pts | MDDB Pick ↗ | MDDB Pts | Actual Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trevor LawrenceQB | 13 of 13 (100%) | ✓ 3 | Trevor LawrenceQB | ✓ 3 | ||
| 2 | Zach WilsonQB | 13 of 13 (100%) | ✓ 3 | Zach WilsonQB | ✓ 3 | ||
| 3 | Mac JonesQB | 8 of 13 (62%) | ◐ 1 | Mac JonesQB | ◐ 1 | ||
| 4 | Kyle PittsTE | 12 of 13 (92%) | ✓ 3 | Kyle PittsTE | ✓ 3 | ||
| 5 | Ja'Marr ChaseWR | 10 of 13 (77%) | ✓ 3 | Ja'Marr ChaseWR | ✓ 3 | ||
| 6 | Jaylen WaddleWR | 6 of 13 (46%) | ✓ 3 | Jaylen WaddleWR | ✓ 3 | ||
| 7 | Penei SewellOT | 6 of 13 (46%) | ✓ 3 | Penei SewellOT | ✓ 3 | ||
| 8 | Jaycee HornCB | 4 of 13 (31%) | ✓ 3 | Rashawn SlaterOT | ◐ 1 | ||
| 9 | Justin FieldsQB | 6 of 13 (46%) | ◐ 1 | Trey LanceQB | ◐ 1 | ||
| 10 | Patrick Surtain IICB | 10 of 13 (77%) | ◐ 1 | Patrick Surtain IICB | ◐ 1 | ||
| 11 | 4 of 13 (31%) | ◐ 1 ◐ 1 | DeVonta SmithWR | ◐ 1 | |||
| 12 | 3 of 13 (23%) | ◐ 1 ◐ 1 | Jaycee HornCB | ◐ 1 | |||
| 13 | Rashawn SlaterOT | 6 of 13 (46%) | ✓ 3 | Christian DarrisawOT | ◐ 1 | ||
| 14 | Jaelan PhillipsEDGE | 5 of 13 (38%) | ◐ 1 | Alijah Vera-TuckerG | ✓ 1 | ||
| 15 | Micah ParsonsLB | 4 of 13 (31%) | ◐ 1 | Justin FieldsQB | ◐ 1 | ||
| 16 | Zaven CollinsOLB | 8 of 13 (62%) | ✓ 3 | Zaven CollinsOLB | ✓ 3 | ||
| 17 | 3 of 13 (23%) | ◐ 1 ◐ 1 ✗ 0 | Micah ParsonsLB | ◐ 1 | |||
| 18 | Kwity PayeEDGE | 7 of 13 (54%) | ◐ 1 | Jaelan PhillipsEDGE | ✓ 3 | ||
| 19 | 4 of 13 (31%) | ✓ 3 ✗ 0 | Jeremiah Owusu-KoramoahLB | ✗ 0 | |||
| 20 | Teven JenkinsOT | 4 of 13 (31%) | ✗ 0 | Teven JenkinsOT | ✗ 0 | ||
| 21 | Jaelan PhillipsEDGE | 5 of 13 (38%) | ◐ 1 | Kwity PayeEDGE | ✓ 3 | ||
| 22 | Elijah MooreWR | 6 of 13 (46%) | ✗ 0 | Caleb FarleyCB | ✓ 3 | ||
| 23 | Travis EtienneRB | 4 of 13 (31%) | ◐ 1 | Greg Newsome IICB | ◐ 1 | ||
| 24 | Najee HarrisRB | 8 of 13 (62%) | ✓ 3 | Najee HarrisRB | ✓ 3 | ||
| 25 | 2 of 13 (15%) | ✗ 0 ◐ 1 ✗ 0 ✗ 0 | Travis EtienneRB | ✓ 3 | |||
| 26 | Jamin DavisLB | 5 of 13 (38%) | ◐ 1 | Trevon MoehrigS | ✗ 0 | ||
| 27 | Odafe OwehEDGE | 5 of 13 (38%) | ◐ 3 | Rashod BatemanWR | ✓ 3 | ||
| 28 | Caleb FarleyCB | 3 of 13 (23%) | ◐ 1 | Kadarius ToneyWR | ◐ 1 | ||
| 29 | Rashod BatemanWR | 4 of 13 (31%) | ◐ 1 | Samuel CosmiOT | ✗ 0 | ||
| 30 | Asante Samuel Jr.CB | 4 of 13 (31%) | ✗ 0 | Gregory RousseauEDGE | ✓ 3 | ||
| 31 | Liam EichenbergOT | 3 of 13 (23%) | ✗ 0 | Odafe OwehEDGE | ✓ 3 | ||
| 32 | Joe Tryon-ShoyinkaEDGE | 4 of 13 (31%) | ✓ 3 | Joe Tryon-ShoyinkaEDGE | ✓ 3 |
✓ exact call · ◐ right player, wrong slot (still Round 1) · ✗ fell out of Round 1. Points use the Huddle Report method (1 pt right player in R1, +2 team match) — switch methods with the scoring selector in the navbar. Split slots (5) show every tied pick, and the slot scores the average of them — a 2-way split where the picks earn 3 and 1 counts as 2, so a tie never earns double credit. Because each slot's consensus is computed independently, the same player can appear at multiple slots — something no real mock draft allows — so only a player's best-scoring slot counts toward the totals (the per-row points still show what each slot would have earned).
The consensus takes the final first-round mock from every selected source — tracked analysts, community members, or your own custom mix — and finds the most-predicted player at each slot. When sources tie, the slot shows a split with every tied pick. Each consensus pick is graded against the actual draft with the same scoring systems used on the accuracy leaderboard — so you can see whether the hive mind beats the individual experts.
Compare your consensus against the MDDB professional consensus mock, dig into accuracy by pick range, then build your own mock draft and decide where to follow the crowd and where to break from consensus.