Loading…
🌐 2022 Consensus Mock Draft vs Actual Results
What everyone thought would happen — and what actually did. Pick whose mocks make up the consensus: the 14 analysts MDS tracks pick-by-pick (a sample that skews toward widely-read, high-ranking analysts — not all 203+ scored analysts), the community's saved mocks, or any mix. Compare against MDDB's 100+-analyst consensus and see how accurate mock drafts really are.
Build your consensus — whose mocks count?
All Analysts (14)
Compare against
🏛️ MDDB Consensus
Scores out of 96 (Huddle Report) · per pick max 3
Consensus Score
34
would rank ~#91 of 106 analysts
Consensus R1 Right
24
of 31 unique players picked
Best call
#4 Gardner
57% agreement — nailed it
Biggest miss
#20 Willis
71% agreed — went #86
MDDB Consensus Score
34
would rank ~#91 of 106 analysts
MDDB Consensus R1 Right
24
of 32 picks
| Pick | Team | Consensus Pick | # Mocked | Consensus Pts | MDDB Pick ↗ | MDDB Pts | Actual Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  JAX | Travon WalkerEDGE | 13 of 14 (93%) | ✓ 3 | Travon WalkerEDGE | ✓ 3 | JAXTravon WalkerEDGE |
| 2 |  DET | Aidan HutchinsonEDGE | 11 of 14 (79%) | ✓ 3 | Aidan HutchinsonEDGE | ✓ 3 | DETAidan HutchinsonEDGE |
| 3 |  HOU | Derek Stingley Jr.CB | 7 of 14 (50%) | ✓ 3 | Ikem EkwonuOT | ◐ 1 | HOUDerek Stingley Jr.CB |
| 4 |  NYJ | Ahmad GardnerCB | 8 of 14 (57%) | ✓ 3 | Kayvon ThibodeauxEDGE | ◐ 1 | NYJAhmad GardnerCB |
| 5 |  NYG | Evan NealOT | 4 of 14 (29%) | ◐ 3 | Evan NealOT | ◐ 3 | NYGKayvon ThibodeauxEDGE |
| 6 |  CAR | Charles CrossOT | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Charles CrossOT | ◐ 1 | CARIkem EkwonuOT |
| 7 | NYG | 2 of 14 (14%) | ◐ 1 ◐ 1 ◐ 1 ✓ 3 ◐ 1 | Ahmad GardnerCB | ◐ 1 | NYGEvan NealOT | |
| 8 |  ATL | 3 of 14 (21%) | ✓ 3 ◐ 1 ◐ 1 | Garrett WilsonWR | ◐ 1 | ATLDrake LondonWR | |
| 9 |  SEA | 3 of 14 (21%) | ✓ 3 ◐ 1 ◐ 1 | Jameson WilliamsWR | ◐ 1 | SEACharles CrossOT | |
| 10 | NYJ | Garrett WilsonWR | 6 of 14 (43%) | ✓ 3 | Jermaine Johnson IIEDGE | ◐ 3 | NYJGarrett WilsonWR |
| 11 |  WAS | Drake LondonWR | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Kyle HamiltonS | ◐ 1 |  NOChris OlaveWR |
| 12 |  MIN | Trent McDuffieCB | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Trent McDuffieCB | ◐ 1 | DETJameson WilliamsWR |
| 13 | HOU | Jameson WilliamsWR | 3 of 14 (21%) | ◐ 1 | Kenny PickettQB | ◐ 1 |  PHIJordan DavisDT |
| 14 |  BAL | Jordan DavisDT | 9 of 14 (64%) | ◐ 1 | Jordan DavisDT | ◐ 1 | BALKyle HamiltonS |
| 15 | PHI | Jameson WilliamsWR | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Drake LondonWR | ◐ 1 | HOUKenyon GreenG |
| 16 | NO | Chris OlaveWR | 7 of 14 (50%) | ◐ 3 | Trevor PenningOT | ◐ 3 | WASJahan DotsonWR |
| 17 |  LAC | Trevor PenningOT | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Chris OlaveWR | ◐ 1 | LACZion JohnsonG |
| 18 | PHI | Trent McDuffieCB | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Devin LloydLB | ◐ 1 |  TENTreylon BurksWR |
| 19 | NO | Tyler SmithOT | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Daxton HillS | ◐ 1 | NOTrevor PenningOT |
| 20 |  PIT | Malik WillisQB | 10 of 14 (71%) | ✗ 0 | Malik WillisQB | ✗ 0 | PITKenny PickettQB |
| 21 |  NE | Devin LloydLB | 7 of 14 (50%) | ◐ 1 | Zion JohnsonG | ◐ 1 |  KCTrent McDuffieCB |
| 22 |  GB | Treylon BurksWR | 6 of 14 (43%) | ◐ 1 | George KarlaftisEDGE | ◐ 1 | GBQuay WalkerLB |
| 23 |  ARI | George KarlaftisEDGE | 5 of 14 (36%) | ◐ 1 | Andrew BoothCB | ✗ 0 |  BUFKaiir ElamCB |
| 24 |  DAL | Zion JohnsonG | 6 of 14 (43%) | ◐ 1 | Treylon BurksWR | ◐ 1 | DALTyler SmithOT |
| 25 | BUF | 3 of 14 (21%) | ✗ 0 ✗ 0 ◐ 1 | Tyler SmithOT | ◐ 1 | BALTyler LinderbaumC | |
| 26 | TEN | Tyler SmithOT | 4 of 14 (29%) | ◐ 1 | Travis JonesDT | ✗ 0 | NYJJermaine Johnson IIEDGE |
| 27 |  TB | 3 of 14 (21%) | ◐ 1 ◐ 1 ◐ 1 ✗ 0 | Devonte WyattDT | ◐ 1 | JAXDevin LloydLB | |
| 28 | GB | Arnold EbiketieEDGE | 4 of 14 (29%) | ✗ 0 | Kyler GordonCB | ✗ 0 | GBDevonte WyattDT |
| 29 | KC | Boye MafeEDGE | 3 of 14 (21%) | ✗ 0 | Boye MafeEDGE | ✗ 0 | NECole StrangeG |
| 30 | KC | 2 of 14 (14%) | ✗ 0 ✗ 0 ◐ 1 ◐ 1 | Logan HallDT | ✗ 0 | KCGeorge KarlaftisEDGE | |
| 31 |  CIN | George KarlaftisEDGE | 4 of 14 (29%) | ◐ 1 | Nakobe DeanLB | ✗ 0 | CINDaxton HillS |
| 32 | DET | 2 of 14 (14%) | ◐ 1 ✓ 1 | Jalen PitreS | ✗ 0 | MINLewis CineS |
✓ exact call · ◐ right player, wrong slot (still Round 1) · ✗ fell out of Round 1. Points use the Huddle Report method (1 pt right player in R1, +2 team match) — switch methods with the scoring selector in the navbar. Split slots (7) show every tied pick, and the slot scores the average of them — a 2-way split where the picks earn 3 and 1 counts as 2, so a tie never earns double credit. Because each slot's consensus is computed independently, the same player can appear at multiple slots — something no real mock draft allows — so only a player's best-scoring slot counts toward the totals (the per-row points still show what each slot would have earned).
How the Consensus Mock Draft Works
The consensus takes the final first-round mock from every selected source — tracked analysts, community members, or your own custom mix — and finds the most-predicted player at each slot. When sources tie, the slot shows a split with every tied pick. Each consensus pick is graded against the actual draft with the same scoring systems used on the accuracy leaderboard — so you can see whether the hive mind beats the individual experts.
Compare your consensus against the MDDB professional consensus mock, dig into accuracy by pick range, then build your own mock draft and decide where to follow the crowd and where to break from consensus.